Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Computers



At 05:25 PM 2/28/97, you wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 14:55:21 -0700
Reply-To: phys-l@mailer.uwf.edu
From: Larry Smith <Larry.Smith@snow.edu>

At 2:39 PM -0600 2/28/97, bob foley wrote:
I fully agree with the statement above, EXCEPT for the
availibilty of equal amounts of software applications.
PC software far exceeds the currently available
software for Mac's.

But what have you got that a Mac user really lacks? You have 50 word
processors to choose from (3 or 4 good ones), Mac people have 6-8 to choose
from (3 or 4 good ones); you have 83 spreadsheets to choose from, Mac
people choose from 5 or 6 (and still get one as good); you choose from 10
database programs, Mac users choose from 5. True, there are fewer software
choices on the Mac side, but still plenty to give us at least one good
choice in each category. How many word processors (or browsers or
spreadsheets or...) can a body use?

To my knowledge, there aren't very many truly unique software packages that
are PC-onl, and there are probably an equal number of truly unique packages
that are Mac-only.

Larry

Look, the point is that there are simply more PCs and clones out there; thus
it is easier to find software for them, its easier to work with the general
populace who, for the most part, also own them, and its easier to find help
when things go wrong. I'm sure the next post on this subject will say
something like "but macs don't break often, so it doesn't matter!" True, but
if you had the choice between a reliable Volvo in an area with no repair
shops for Volvos and a slightly less reliable Chrysler, for which repair
shops exist, which would you choose?

Ryan