Phys-L Archive Search using Namazu: a Full-Text Search Engine

This index contains 84,777 documents and 1,038,089 keywords.

Last modified: 2024-05-18

Results:

References: [ Foucault: 123 ] [ Pendulum: 1198 ]

Total 96 documents matching your query.

61. non-relative angular velocity (score: 26): Author: Herbert H Gottlieb <herbgottlieb@JUNO.COM>; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:07:52 -0500; David ... Thanks you for the detailed explanation. Since arguments such as those that you propose in your reply are not usually available in our textbooks, perhaps you would consider submitting an ar; /archives/2000/02_2000/msg00127.html (7,851 bytes)
62. operationally inertial frames (score: 26): Author: John Denker <jsd@MONMOUTH.COM>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 10:24:48 -0400; And at 07:51 AM 10/13/99 -0500, Joel Rauber seemed to agree with passage <1>, saying: Passage <2> expresses the corret physics. I cannot understand passage <1>; it seems totally inconsistent with th; /archives/1999/10_1999/msg00426.html (6,137 bytes)
63. operationally inertial frames (score: 26): Author: "A. R. Marlow" <marlow@LOYNO.EDU>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 10:00:51 -0500; I missed John Mallinckrodt's original post, but I do not understand what "modern viewpoint" is being espoused. It is certainly not the viewpoint of general relativity which has a clearly defined clas; /archives/1999/10_1999/msg00428.html (7,232 bytes)
64. operationally inertial frames (score: 26): Author: John Mallinckrodt <ajmallinckro@CSUPOMONA.EDU>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 08:11:58 -0800; Passage <2> expresses the corret physics. I cannot understand passage <1>; it seems totally inconsistent with the correct physics. ... the literature contains two inconsistent definitions of "inerti; /archives/1999/10_1999/msg00429.html (7,643 bytes)
65. the latest in science (score: 23): Author: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>; Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 21:11:06 -0700; On 01/03/2016 06:00 PM, Bernard Cleyet wrote: Published on Feb 17, 2015 Bandar Al-Khaybari, a preacher with the Saudi Ministry of Islamic Affairs in Al-Madina, claimed that the Earth is fixed and doe; /archives/2016/1_2016/msg00003.html (6,808 bytes)
66. Sun going around the Earth? (score: 23): Author: "Anthony Lapinski" <alapinski@pds.org>; Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:03:33 -0400; Interesting discussion! Well, there is much scientific evidence supporting the heliocentric theory. The Earth certainly appears flat and motionless, and people believed this for thousands of years. T; /archives/2015/3_2015/msg00089.html (7,202 bytes)
67. Sun going around the Earth? (score: 23): Author: Marty Weiss <martweiss@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:37:51 -0400; One major problem with teaching it this way is that (many? most?) people are either anti-science or science illiterate, so when we show the scientific process they say, "See, you scientists can't agr; /archives/2015/3_2015/msg00090.html (7,741 bytes)
68. Sun going around the Earth? (score: 23): Author: Diego Saravia <dsa@unsa.edu.ar>; Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:31:19 -0300; Its a language problem there is nothing in "the reality" that tells you that something is going arround other thing or viceversa. movements are relative. ok, its easiest to explain in one way than in; /archives/2015/3_2015/msg00092.html (10,847 bytes)
69. Sun going around the Earth? (score: 23): Author: "John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>; Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:32:18 -0500; Of course from the point of view of students in HS they generally can not come up with any good evidence for why we insist that the Earth goes around the Sun. They have been told it so much that they; /archives/2015/3_2015/msg00080.html (6,349 bytes)
70. Sun going around the Earth? (score: 23): Author: "Anthony Lapinski" <alapinski@pds.org>; Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:47:26 -0400; Interesting discussion! Well, there is much scientific evidence supporting the heliocentric theory. The Earth certainly appears flat and motionless, and people believed this for thousands of years. T; /archives/2015/3_2015/msg00088.html (7,212 bytes)
71. pseudo-force (score: 23): Author: Karim Diff <karim.diff@sfcc.edu>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:36:55 -0400; I found some discussion of pseudoforces/Non-inertial frames of reference in 2 books in my collection: 1. Tipler "Physics for scientists and engineers" 4th ed. has a couple of pages on the subject. Ju; /archives/2006/10_2006/msg00549.html (5,461 bytes)
72. Re: Rotating reference frames video (score: 23): Author: Bernard Cleyet <anngeorg@PACBELL.NET>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 01:54:51 -0800; John! UCSC Physics has a round about. The wood shop made a "plate" that fits on it so students may roll balls and use pendulum stands. Campus fac. installed an outlet, so portable high power lamps en; /archives/2005/11_2005/msg00301.html (5,810 bytes)
73. Measuring acceleration of Earth (score: 23): Author: Chuck Britton <britton@NCSSM.EDU>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:48:54 -0500; The Foucault pendulum is the classic for showing the rotation about the axis. At 2:30 PM +0200 11/3/04, Savinainen Antti wrote: Hi all, how can the acceleration of Earth with respect to Sun be measur; /archives/2004/11_2004/msg00006.html (4,986 bytes)
74. conserved momentum thru gas... (score: 17): Author: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 23:50:40 -0700; On 12/21/22 1:32 PM, O A via Phys-l wrote: Interestingly, the "how" became important for me precisely when regarding the "steady state". It isn't uniform in this, right? I said /in the absence of dis; /archives/2022/12_2022/msg00030.html (8,224 bytes)
75. Sun going around the Earth? (score: 17): Author: "Strickert, Rick (Consultant)" <rstrickert@signaturescience.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:21:07 +0000; Does that someone's "perfectly consistent general relativistic framework where the Sun would be going around the Earth" also explain Galileo's observed phases of Venus, Ole Roemer's measurements of J; /archives/2015/3_2015/msg00074.html (6,184 bytes)
76. Sun going around the Earth? (score: 17): Author: Herbert Schulz <herbs@wideopenwest.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:04:23 -0500; On Mar 25, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Strickert, Rick (Consultant) <rstrickert@signaturescience.com> wrote: Does that someone's "perfectly consistent general relativistic framework where the Sun would be goin; /archives/2015/3_2015/msg00076.html (6,112 bytes)
77. absolute "motion" (score: 17): Author: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:20:39 -0700; On 08/22/2013 03:57 PM, jbellina wrote: An interesting question is what constitutes proof that the earth is in fact moving? How about a Foucault pendulum? The phenomenon in question has real-life rel; /archives/2013/8_2013/msg00141.html (5,092 bytes)
78. absolute "motion" (score: 17): Author: Bruce Sherwood <Bruce_Sherwood@ncsu.edu>; Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:44:16 -0600; But that only suggests that the Earth is rotating, not that it is going around some star or other. Bruce On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:20 PM, John Denker <jsd@av8n.com> wrote: On 08/22/2013 03:57 PM, jbe; /archives/2013/8_2013/msg00142.html (5,942 bytes)
79. Something to ponder and worry about (score: 17): Author: "Spagna Jr., George" <gspagna@rmc.edu>; Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:14:07 +0000; Jbellina asks: An interesting question is what constitutes proof that the earth is in fact moving? Aberration of starlight, annual parallax are evidence that the Earth moves around the Sun; Foucault; /archives/2013/8_2013/msg00146.html (5,370 bytes)
80. absolute acceleration and not velocity or position (score: 17): Author: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:51:54 -0700; I can hardly imagine a more appropriate topic for discussion in this forum. Furthermore, asking "what's the evidence" is a fine way to approach the topic. == When I chose the previous Subject: line -; /archives/2013/8_2013/msg00157.html (8,983 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

This search system is powered by Namazu v2.0.21

changeme.com