Re: [Phys-L] sun path diagram

["Prof. Keith S. Taber" <kst24@cam.ac.uk>]

 Tucson, Arizona!? I know it is a real place, but it just makes me smile.

(Just make me think of the songs by the Beatles and Dan Fogelberg)

K


On 11/08/2022 21:31, John Denker via Phys-l wrote:
> Maybe everybody but me already knows about this, but I
> only recently ran across this "sun path diagram". 

--

“Man is not merely made for science, but science is made for man. It 
expresses his deepest intellectual needs as well as his careful 
observations. It is an effort to bring internal meanings into harmony 
with external verifications. It attempts therefore to control, as well 
as to submit, to conceive with rational unity, as well as to accept 
data. Its arts are those directed towards self-possession as well as 
toward an imitation of the outer reality we find. It seeks therefore a 
disciplined freedom of thought. The discipline is as essential as the 
freedom; but the latter also has its place. The theories of science are 
human, as well as objective, internally rational, as well as (when that 
is possible) subject to external tests.” 
<https://science-education-research.com/commonplace/>


Dr. Keith S. Taber

Emeritus Professor of Science Education
University of Cambridge
http://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/staff/taber.html


Senior Member
Homerton College, Cambridge


https://science-education-research.com



Some recent postings include

Can deforestation stop indigenous groups starving? 
<https://science-education-research.com/can-deforestation-stop-indigenous-groups-starving/>

How much damage can a couple of molecules do? Just how dangerous is 
Novichok? 
<https://science-education-research.com/how-much-damage-can-a-couple-of-molecules-do/>

What COVID really likes. Researching viral preferences. 
<https://science-education-research.com/what-covid-really-likes/>

Of mostly natural origin. Is your shampoo of natural, unnatural, or 
supernatural origin? 
<“https://science-education-research.com/of-mostly-natural-origin/”;>

Not a great experiment…What was wrong with The Loneliness Experiment? 
<“https://science-education-research.com/not-a-great-experiment/”;>

Bats are [almost certainly] not closely related to viruses. 
<“https://science-education-research.com/bats-are-almost-certainly-not-closely-related-to-viruses/”;>





Recently published scholarship:

*Taber, K. S. (2019). Experimental research into teaching innovations: 
responding to methodological and ethical challenges. *
/Studies in Science Education./ doi:10.1080/03057267.2019.1658058

*/The Nature of the Chemical Concept/*/: Re-constructing Chemical 
Knowledge in Teaching and Learning/
Royal Society of Chemistry, 
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/ebook/978-1-78262-460-8

*Taber, K. S. (2021). The Challenge to Educational Reforms during a 
Global Emergency: The Case of Progressive Science Education./C.E.P.S. 
Journal/, 11 (Special issue), 1-21. doi:doi: 10.26529/cepsj.1109*


Recent publications primarily for teachers:

*/Foundations for Teaching Chemistry/*/: Chemical knowledge for teaching/
Routledge, ISBN: 9780815377740

*/MasterClass in Science Education/*/: Transforming Teaching and Learning/
Bloomsbury Academic, ISBN: 9781474289412


Editor-in-Chief: */RSC Advances in Chemistry Education Series/*
Royal Society of Chemistry Book Series
Proposals for Advances in Chemistry Education volumes (edited or 
monograph) are invited. Scholarly books on all aspects of chemistry 
education are being considered for publication in the series ( 
https://science-education-research.com/advances-in-chemistry-education/ )




*ECLIPSE - /Exploring Conceptual Learning, Integration and Progression 
in Science Education/*
https://science-education-research.com/projects/eclipse/



*Reject publisher contracts that ask you to waive your legal rights*
Authors are granted the 'moral' right to protect the integrity of their 
works in law.
There is no reason for reputable academic publishers to ask authors to 
allow them to be able to make changes of any kind, at any time, to 
authors' works, without the author's approval.
Scholars should not be prepared to abandon their legal right to object 
to changes that undermine the integrity of their scholarly works.
Academics should refuse to sign publishers' contracts that include 
clauses that require authors to waive their legal moral rights.
Sign a petition to ask publishers to respect authors' legal rights: 
*https://science-education-research.com/academic-standards/defend-the-moral-right-to-the-integrity-of-your-scholarly-work/*