Re: [Phys-L] good? news

[bernard cleyet <bernard@cleyet.org>]

> On 2022/Feb/24, at 06:34, David Bowman <David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu> wrote:
>
> How significant after discounting sampling noise?
>
> David Bowman


Haven’t read, but I suspect this will answer your question.    

https://www.pewresearch.org/our-methods/ <https://www.pewresearch.org/our-methods/>  


I have no idea what the distribution(s) is (are)    So what the meaning of 1% +/- x would mean  


Re:  

https://prorevnews.blogspot.com/2022/02/decline-in-great-deal-of-public.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email <https://prorevnews.blogspot.com/2022/02/decline-in-great-deal-of-public.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email> <https://prorevnews.blogspot.com/2022/02/decline-in-great-deal-of-public.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email <https://prorevnews.blogspot.com/2022/02/decline-in-great-deal-of-public.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email>>  


Curiously only scientists and religious leaders has (sic) increased confidence   

Pew research.   


bc