Re: [Phys-L] vaccine deniers and per

[O A <omarakhtar01@gmail.com>]

New here so just a sincere question:

is this germane to the purpose of this listserve? Also: a simple argument
from data and actual scientific evidence (as in: the output of the actual
scientific method) should both suffice as well as be a possible broader
lesson and reminder.

The clinical data from Pfizer - the same they fought hard to keep from
releasing for 75 years, alongside the US FDA that was ostensibly regulating
them) is freely available, updated monthly with each c.500pg court-ordered
release 'package', and easy to search: https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

On Thu., Dec. 15, 2022, 2:02 p.m. Keith C Tipton via Phys-l, <
phys-l@mail.phys-l.org> wrote:

> The link from the WHO has a different link from where I sit --
> <
> https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/WHO-EURO-2017-2899-42657-59427>
>
> -- "How to respond to vocal vaccine deniers in public: best practice
> guidance" -- and you can download from there.
>
>
> bernard cleyet wrote on 12/15/22 12:40 PM:
> >
> https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/315761/Vocal-vaccine-deniers-guidance-document.pdf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org
> https://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l