|Chronology||Current Month||Current Thread||Current Date|
|[Year List] [Month List (current year)]||[Date Index] [Thread Index]||[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]||[Date Prev] [Date Next]|
Interesting. The science is impressive. The ethics more questionable.
What is the value of an application that can identify people's sexual
preferences - presumably only useful to be applied regardless of their
wishes as otherwise one could just ask them. Will it be used by bouncers
in gay clubs, or… by youth leaders in fundamentalist churches?
If you can tell (statistically) sexual preference from faces, can you
tell level of promiscuity? faithfulness? level of sexual satisfaction?
level of sexual skills?
Not entirely meant to be flippant:
* Can such technology be used to identify terrorists from their faces
(sounds good) with an error rate (ah!)
* Can such technology be used to identify dissenters in a totalitarian
regime from their faces - with an error rate?
* Can such technology be used to identify belief in God in a state
that requires religious observation - with an error rate?
I'm sure there are plenty of other examples.
On 03/12/2022 16:40, Brian Whatcott wrote:
The relevance to this list is sketchy, it's true, but here is a pointerto the work of Stanford researchers on distinguishing gay people using
their facial images …
Dr. Keith S. Taber
Emeritus Professor of Science Education
University of Cambridge
Homerton College, Cambridge
"…the real world – in other words, objective nature – stands behind
everything explorable. In contrast to it, the scientific world picture
gained by experience – the phenomenological world – remains always a
mere approximation, a more or less well divined model."
Some recent postings include
Can deforestation stop indigenous groups starving?
The heart-stopping queen: An analogy for a paralysing poison.
What COVID really likes. Researching viral preferences.
Of mostly natural origin. Is your shampoo of natural, unnatural, or
Not a great experiment…What was wrong with The Loneliness Experiment?
We didn’t start the fire (it was the virus). A simile for viral
Recently published scholarship:
*Taber, K. S. (2019). Experimental research into teaching innovations:
responding to methodological and ethical challenges. *
/Studies in Science Education./ doi:10.1080/03057267.2019.1658058
*/The Nature of the Chemical Concept/*/: Re-constructing Chemical
Knowledge in Teaching and Learning/
Royal Society of Chemistry,
*Taber, K. S. (2021). The Challenge to Educational Reforms during a
Global Emergency: The Case of Progressive Science Education./C.E.P.S.
Journal/, 11 (Special issue), 1-21. doi:doi: 10.26529/cepsj.1109*
Recent publications primarily for teachers:
*/Foundations for Teaching Chemistry/*/: Chemical knowledge for teaching/
Routledge, ISBN: 9780815377740
*/MasterClass in Science Education/*/: Transforming Teaching and Learning/
Bloomsbury Academic, ISBN: 9781474289412
Editor-in-Chief: */RSC Advances in Chemistry Education Series/*
Royal Society of Chemistry Book Series
Proposals for Advances in Chemistry Education volumes (edited or
monograph) are invited. Scholarly books on all aspects of chemistry
education are being considered for publication in the series (
*ECLIPSE - /Exploring Conceptual Learning, Integration and Progression
in Science Education/*
*Reject publisher contracts that ask you to waive your legal rights*
Authors are granted the 'moral' right to protect the integrity of their
works in law.
There is no reason for reputable academic publishers to ask authors to
allow them to be able to make changes of any kind, at any time, to
authors' works, without the author's approval.
Scholars should not be prepared to abandon their legal right to object
to changes that undermine the integrity of their scholarly works.
Academics should refuse to sign publishers' contracts that include
clauses that require authors to waive their legal moral rights.
Sign a petition to ask publishers to respect authors' legal rights:
Forum for Physics Educators