Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
a friend of mine pointed out prof. Sean Carroll's explanation of the twin
"paradox": <https://youtu.be/quQ7YiI-Urc?t=4530>
https://youtu.be/quQ7YiI-Urc?t=4530
He states that acceleration is not the reason for the time difference
between the twins; instead, the reason is in different paths in space-time.
However, he continues and says that taking a different path requires
acceleration in this scenario. This seems valid to me. What do you think?
All this was motivated by a philosopher of physics called Maudlin, who
claimed that Feynman's explanation on the twin "paradox" in terms of
acceleration was completely wrong. Here is a rebuttal of that claim:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.02148.pdf.