Re: [Phys-L] six days

[bernard cleyet <bernard@cleyet.org>]

I’ve added a bunch  (California). to http://cleyet.org/covid-19/. 


More soon.


bc.  thinks low (small?). R^2 due to few datums (not Latin) in Oklahoma graph.  


Contrary to Paul N’s  supposition, nearly all my exponential fits are in the R^2’ed 0.99 + region.   My intuition is it has something to do w/ the CLT.  


I've many more exponentially fitted graphs not posted here:  http://cleyet.org/covid-19/   


BTW,  If below were true it’d be easy to make the "fake” data “messy".   

> On 2020/Mar/20, at 12:52, Paul Nord <paul.nord@valpo.edu> wrote:
>
> One of the critiques of the data provided by the Chinese government was
> that the R-squared value for a simple model was too good.  Data about
> something as "messy" as people are unlikely to be 0.7 or above.  You've got
> .997 for that.  Thoughts?
>
> Paul

> On 2020/Mar/29, at 15:53, brian whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>
> Here is today's plot product for Oklahoma
>
> https://imgur.com/a/LjNDR7Y <https://imgur.com/a/LjNDR7Y>
>
> [sorry for the previous post - out of practice sharing with Phys-l!]
>
> Brian W