Chronology |
Current Month |
Current Thread |
Current Date |

[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |

*From*: Ken Caviness <caviness@southern.edu>*Date*: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:52:29 +0000

I thought that too, but if we imagine moving the cylindrically shaped volume of water so that its center of mass moves up to ground level, without assuming any shape-shifting, half of the water is above the CoM, half below. Is it not true that then the shape-shift itself has a zero-energy cost? For every slice at depth y below the CoM, there's a matching slice at height y above the CoM: no net change in potential energy. I would expect this to be -- ahem! -- a wash. <grin!> But it can't be, since we get two different answers using slices and CoM calculations.

Still musing,

Ken

Kenneth E. Caviness, Ph.D.

Chair & Professor, Physics & Engineering

Southern Adventist University

P.O. Box 370, Collegedale, TN 37315

Office: 423-236-2856

Fax: 423-236-1856

E-mail: caviness@southern.edu

Schedule a Zoom or Office Meeting with me HERE: https://calendly.com/caviness/

-----Original Message-----

From: Phys-l <phys-l-bounces@mail.phys-l.org> On Behalf Of Brian Whatcott

Sent: Tuesday, 8 December, 2020 10:38

To: Phys-L@phys-l.org

Subject: [ext] Re: [Phys-L] Ex: Re: Fluids problem

Key concept: a cylinder of water shape-shifts to an infinitesimally thin lamina of water when pumped at lowest energy cost. On Tuesday, December 8, 2020, 09:27:40 AM CST, Albert J. Mallinckrodt <ajm@cpp.edu> wrote:

Yes. I’m guessing Peter had that “block“ frozen.

On Dec 8, 2020, at 6:44 AM, John Denker via Phys-l <phys-l@mail.phys-l.org> wrote:_______________________________________________

Setting aside typos, the key idea is this:

The center of mass is given by:

∫ X dm / ∫ dm [1]

pretty much by definition, where dm is an element of mass, and X is

position.

Note X can be one dimensional in the simple introductory situation, or

higher-dimensional if you want.

Given the symmetry of the situation, you can find the CM by

inspection, based on physicist's intuition and experience, without

doing the calculus. It's in the middle.

If you want to do the calculus, it's

∫ X dX / ∫ dX

since in this situation dm is proportional to dX.

Turn the crank and find that the CM is halfway between the limits of

integration ... in agreement with the aforementioned intuition and

experience.

This comes up All The Time.

Note that the same formula [1] is also the formula for weighted

average, where dm tells you how things get weighted. In the case

where dm = dX this reduces to a simple unweighted average.

_______________________________________________

Forum for Physics Educators

Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org

https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.

phys-l.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fphys-l&data=04%7C01%7Cajm%40cpp.edu%

7Cc7801d54cfbb4e0a622208d89b87b5f6%7C164ba61e39ec4f5d89ffaa1f00a521b4%

7C0%7C0%7C637430354465079748%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwM

DAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=3HkCPuh

mA9Yfd4SDMUDPl0VHOXNcUC8Wijdsip%2BAvTM%3D&reserved=0

CAUTION: This email was not sent from a Cal Poly Pomona service. Exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments. Please forward suspicious email to suspectemail@cpp.edu<mailto:suspectemail@cpp.edu>.

Forum for Physics Educators

Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org

https://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l

_______________________________________________

Forum for Physics Educators

Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org

https://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: [Phys-L] [ext] Re: Ex: Re: Fluids problem***From:*"Albert J. Mallinckrodt" <ajm@cpp.edu>

**References**:**[Phys-L] Fluids problem***From:*Peter Schoch <pschoch@fandm.edu>

**Re: [Phys-L] Fluids problem***From:*Carl Mungan <mungan@usna.edu>

**Re: [Phys-L] Fluids problem***From:*John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>

**Re: [Phys-L] Ex: Re: Fluids problem***From:*"Albert J. Mallinckrodt" <ajm@cpp.edu>

**Re: [Phys-L] Ex: Re: Fluids problem***From:*Brian Whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: [Phys-L] Ex: Re: Fluids problem** - Next by Date:
**Re: [Phys-L] [ext] Re: Ex: Re: Fluids problem** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [Phys-L] Ex: Re: Fluids problem** - Next by thread:
**Re: [Phys-L] [ext] Re: Ex: Re: Fluids problem** - Index(es):