Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-L] causality

I've been thinking about this example (Newton's 2nd Law) and other continuity equations. I see Newton's second law as a continuity equation which I see as being synonymous with a conservation law. For some system, say a brick, the force on the brick is the rate at which momentum is flowing into the brick and the rate of change of momentum of the brick is what we often represent as the mass times the acceleration of the brick. The total momentum of the brick is changing right there at the boundary where the incoming momentum is crossing the boundary. Any change in the total amount of momentum inside the boundary (between the closed surface of the brick and the rest of the universe) is occurring at the exact same instant as the momentum crosses the boundary. I can't see any cause and effect when the two things occur simultaneously. Is the momentum of the brick changing because momentum is flowing across the boundary or do we judge there to be momentum flowing across the boundary because it is decreasing at the boundary on one side of the boundary and increasing at the boundary at the other side of the boundary. Epstein, in his book, Relativity Visualized, refers to the statement that force causes acceleration as (something like) the great myth of the physics community. I confess to using the cause and effect language but I don't really think force causes acceleration.

-----Original Message-----
From: Phys-l <phys-l-bounces@mail.phys-l.org> On Behalf Of Alex. F. Burr via
Phys-l
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 10:02 PM
To: Phys-L@Phys-L.org
Cc: aburr@aol.com
Subject: Re: [Phys-L] causality

As well as anybody might.jsd is right and insightful as usual. but there is
more. Consider a one dimentional systen of a mass (and  reference frame).F
= ma and a = F/m. Notice that the equation and math says nothing about
causality. But the physics says the F most likely causes the a. Newton is
celebrated as the physicist who suggested this.
Physics is not math and vice versa.
Alex. F. BurrIn a message dated 2/7/2019 1:15:22 PM Mountain Standard
Time, phys-l@mail.phys-l.org writes:

Still having some issues with causality.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l