Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
-----Original Message-----
From: Phys-l [mailto:phys-l-bounces@mail.phys-l.org] On Behalf Of brian
whatcott
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 10:56 PM
To: phys-l@mail.phys-l.org
Subject: Re: [Phys-L] electron velocity in an electric field.
On 4/24/2018 4:12 PM, Don via Phys-l wrote:
Thanks to Brian Whatcott for the non-relativistic and engineering details ofthis problem and David Bowman for the special relativity theoretical
correction. I'm curious if anyone can estimate the relative importance of the
radiation and general relativity corrections. Including radiation must result in
a higher initial electron velocity to supply the extra required initial KE. But it's
been too many years for me to remember how to calculate the magnitude of
the radiation, and I have no idea what general relativity does.
The Larmor formulation shows the energy dissipated by radiation from a
Don
Dr. Donald Polvani
Adjunct Faculty, Physics, Retired
Anne Arundel Community College
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
decelerating charge. An E&M text by Purcell was used by Dan Schroeder
(Weber State) as a reference source for a talk he gave at a meeting of the
AAPT (1999). Here is the text he spoke to.
<http://physics.weber.edu/schroeder/mrr/MRRtalk.html>
The final paragraph is titled Quantitative Treatment of Radiation,
where he diagrams the Larmor formula for this case.
Brian W
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l