Re: [Phys-L] Fw: (no subject)

["Donald Polvani" <dgpolvani@verizon.net>]

I think the problem is at Phys-L.  I also got a message much like Bob Sciamanda's and BC's.

Don Polvani

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phys-l [mailto:phys-l-bounces@mail.phys-l.org] On Behalf Of bernard
> cleyet
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 6:31 PM
> To: Phys-L@Phys-L.org
> Subject: Re: [Phys-L] Fw: (no subject)
>
> Is the prob. at marx and bc?   Or at phys-l?
>
> bc  ’s been accused.
>
>
> > On 2017/Feb/13, at 15:03, Bob Sciamanda <treborsci@verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> > SCAM????
> >
> > -----Original Message----- From: marx@phy.ilstu.edu
> > Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 1:51 PM
> > To: phys-l@phys-l.org
> > Subject: [Phys-L] (no subject)
> >
> > "Re: [Phys-L] circuit analysis : a simpler approach?"
> > Phys-L@phys-l.org doc
> > _______________________________________________
> > Forum for Physics Educators
> > Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org
> > http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Forum for Physics Educators
> > Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org
> > http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org
> http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l