Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
On 2017/Nov/16, at 12:41, Joseph Bellina via Phys-l <phys-l@mail.phys-l.org> wrote:
Em's are a bear to maintain let alone refurbish. You would be much better off in time and money to take John' s advice
Best
Joe
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 16, 2017, at 2:58 PM, John Denker via Phys-l <phys-l@mail.phys-l.org> wrote:
On 11/16/2017 12:10 PM, Peter Schoch asked:
Does anyone know anything about this? We'd like to try and rehab it and
get it working if it is not too costly in time or money.
I strongly suspect you could build a tunneling microscope
(STM) /from scratch/ for a fraction of the time and money
it would take to rehab a 1940s electron microscope. Andit
it would be more versatile, and easier to use, and with
better resolution, and safer, and, and, and.