Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Here is a paraphrase of a question from a physics text.
A ball falls, hits the ground, and rebounds at nearly the same
speed. a) Is the momentum of the ball conserved throughout this
time? b) Is the momentum of the (ball+earth system) conserved
throughout this time?
[...] then I
started thinking about what conservation means. Certainly the
momentum of the ball is not *constant*, while the momentum of the
(ball+earth) *is* constant.
Now my position is that this is a poorly worded, misleading question.
Conservation of momentum still applies to the ball by itself.
Conservation laws mean the quantity only changes to the extent that
there is some flow into/out of the system.
This is still true for
the ball by itself – the change in momentum is equal to the impulse
due to external forces.
So I now would to reword this this:
a) Is momentum conserved if we consider the system to be the ball by itself?
b) Is momentum conserved if we consider the system to be the (ball+earth)?
Then the answers would be “yes” and “yes” but require slightly
different reasoning in each case.
But it is too late because the
students already turned in their answers.