Chronology
Current Month
Current Thread
Current Date
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
[
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
[
Thread Prev
] [
Thread Next
]
[
Date Prev
] [
Date Next
]
Re: [Phys-L] aluminum resistivity
From
: Bernard Cleyet <
bernard@cleyet.org
>
Date
: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 19:08:39 -0700
On 2014, Jul 21, , at 11:06, John Denker <jsd@av8n.com> wrote:
Right.
That's about 6% more than the accepted value for ultra-pure Al.
And annealed?
Would work hardening ultra-pure Al and remeasuring its conductivity a useful engineering materials lab exercise?
bc
References
:
[Phys-L] aluminum resistivity
From:
"Anthony Lapinski" <Anthony_Lapinski@pds.org>
Re: [Phys-L] aluminum resistivity
From:
"Folkerts, Timothy J" <FolkertsT@bartonccc.edu>
Re: [Phys-L] aluminum resistivity
From:
John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
Prev by Date:
Re: [Phys-L] angular momentum
Next by Date:
Re: [Phys-L] angular momentum - error
Previous by thread:
Re: [Phys-L] aluminum resistivity
Next by thread:
Re: [Phys-L] aluminum resistivity
Index(es):
Date
Thread