Chronology |
Current Month |
Current Thread |
Current Date |

[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |

*From*: Savinainen Antti <antti.savinainen@kuopio.fi>*Date*: Fri, 23 May 2014 08:38:35 +0000

Hi,

I suppose that the power loss in transmission lines is part of most intro courses on E&M. The basic idea is quite clear: given a certain produced power, the greater the voltage the smaller the current is, which means the smaller power loss in the transmission lines. So far so good. We had a simple quantitative calculation on the power loss and I casually asked my students check the case when the voltage is pretty low. This gave a nonsensical answer. I looked at the situation,and quickly derived a formula of the loss fraction. The same formula can be found here: <http://www.bsharp.org/physics/transmission> (Scroll down to the section "High-Voltage Transmission Lines").

What bothers me is that the loss fraction can conceivably be one or even more, which is clearly not physical. Perhaps I am missing something?

Regards,

Antti

--

*************************************************************************

Viesti on tarkastettu roskapostinsuodatus- ja virustorjuntaohjelmistolla.

*************************************************************************

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: [Phys-L] Power loss in transmission lines***From:*John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>

**Re: [Phys-L] Power loss in transmission lines***From:*"Folkerts, Timothy J" <FolkertsT@bartonccc.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: [Phys-L] solar constant** - Next by Date:
**Re: [Phys-L] Power loss in transmission lines** - Previous by thread:
**[Phys-L] Conference announcement** - Next by thread:
**Re: [Phys-L] Power loss in transmission lines** - Index(es):