Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Would (a) be a better answer?
Keith
Hi,
I saw an exam question (actually a specimen paper question) which asked:
Lenz's law is a consequence of the following concervation principle:
a) momentum
b) charge
c) current
d) energy.
Naturally, the only choice making sense is d). However, is it really so that Lenz's law is *consequence* of conservation of energy from the poiint of view em-theory? I would rather say that Lenz's law is consistent with conservation of energy (well, what wouldn't be :-)).
Any ideas?
Regards,
Antti
--
*************************************************************************
Viesti on tarkastettu roskapostinsuodatus- ja virustorjuntaohjelmistolla.
*************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
--
Dr. Keith S. Taber
Chair: Science, Technology & Mathematics Education Academic Group
Reader in Science Education
Science Education Centre
University of Cambridge Faculty of Education
184 Hills Road
Cambridge CB2 8PQ
United Kingdom
http://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/staff/taber.html
https://camtools.cam.ac.uk/access/wiki/site/~kst24/index.html
Editor: Chemistry Education Research and Practice
(Published by the Royal Society of Chemistry)
http://www.rsc.org/publishing/journals/rp/about.asp
Book Reviews Editor: Studies in Science Education
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/03057267.asp
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l