Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-L] science versum math WAS: Buoyancy Questions



This leads to the question: Is math invented or discovered?

Phys-L@Phys-L.org writes:
P.S.
Mathematicians, on the other hand, do not perform experiments; their
statements are validated logically, using accepted axioms and
already-proven theorems. This is also worth emphasizing. Yes, we all use
logic. That is why some people think that mathematics is science.

Was the Pythagorean relation first discovered (by experimenting with
triangles) or was it first derived? I strongly suspect that it was first
discovered and then formally validated.

====================================================


Speculations not based on experimental data

On Jul 2, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Ludwik Kowalski wrote:

Does a wooden ball, of the same size as the mostly-air ball, exhibit
the same behavior? If not then the role of gravity is important (the
buoyant force being nearly the same). That seems to be an experiment
worth performing.

Another parameter worth changing is the size of the mostly-air ball. Do
balls of different size behave in the same way? Experiments designed to
answer such questions, first qualitatively and then quantitatively, are
worth performing. They offer a chance to do what scientist do, when they
try to understood what happens.

Ludwik Kowalski
http://csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/life/intro.html

=============================================

On Jul 2, 2013, at 2:49 PM, John Clement wrote:
It has to be something unique to having been far underwater. So a
reasonable hypothesis is that there is still water on the upper side
as it
comes out, which adds to the weight and makes decreases the net force
on the
ball as it comes out. This might be testable if you take a video of
it.
You may see that as the ball emerges there is still a significant
layer of
water on top of it when you push it far underwater. The surface
tension has
nothing to do with it because it is underwater in both cases. While
fluid
friction comes into play, near the surface this effect should be same
no
matter how deep you push it initially.

So take the video and see what is happening!

John M. Clement
Houston, TX



I was at my sister's pool a few days ago and I noticed that when I
took a ball (a pool volleyball) and submersed it just below the
surface and released it, the ball would jump around 3 or 4
feel above
the surface of the water. When I pushed the ball deeper,
about 2 or 3
feet below the surface and let go, the ball would rise and
then sort
of sputter at the surface and not rise above the surface at
all. Does
anyone know how to explain this. I thought it would be a nice
challenge for my students but the problem is, I don't think
I know what's going on either.
Thanks in advance.
Mike Barr


--
*Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail*
*
*

__o

_ `\ <, _

...... ( * ) / ( * ) Lower Your Emissions, Raise Your Voice!
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l



_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l