Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Q, mass (or L), and the driven response of an oscillator

From: brian whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:32:27 -0500

On 3/25/2012 2:55 PM, Bernard Cleyet wrote:

On 2012, Mar 23, , at 14:49, John Denker wrote:

7) Convince yourself that changing L and/or C (at constant R)
changes ω_0, but leaves the maximum response the same, namely 1/R.

This was the prob. I find this not the case according to several texts for example a spring oscillator. /snip/

Quite so. Q = L/CR

ω_0 = (LC)^-0.5

Brian W

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Phys-l] Q, mass (or L), and the driven response of an oscillator
  - From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>

References:
- [Phys-l] Q, mass (or L), and the driven response of an oscillator
  - From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] Q, mass (or L), and the driven response of an oscillator
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] Q, mass (or L), and the driven response of an oscillator
  - From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>

Prev by Date: [Phys-l] not a monopoly on the news
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-l] not a monopoly on the news
Previous by thread: Re: [Phys-l] Q, mass (or L), and the driven response of an oscillator
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] Q, mass (or L), and the driven response of an oscillator
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread