Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Another way of saying the same thing. The second law of thermodynamics says that the entropy of isolated systems "does not decrease with time." If we discovered in experiments that the entropy of isolated systems "decreases with time," it would mean that the second law of thermodynamics is wrong, NOT that time is running backwards.
John Mallinckrodt
Cal Poly Pomona
On Mar 7, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Jack Uretsky wrote:
I don't understand you. Let me try to explain why in two ways:
"If time is increasing" suggests that "time" is defined in such a
way that it could be non increasing. "Time" is not so defined. We define
"time" by findng a periodic phenomenum, and then counting periods. The
count always increases - by definition. "If time is increasing" is
logically like saying "if four is greater than three". But four is
defined as three plus one. So the "if" in the statement is surplusage;
there is no laternate possibility. Same with "time". We define it so
that there is no alternate possibility.
Regards,
Jack
"Trust me. I have a lot of experience at this."
General Custer's unremembered message to his men,
just before leading them into the Little Big Horn Valley
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Bennett Sessa wrote:
That is my understanding. If time is increasing then entropy must always increase. If time decreases Clausius equality and the entropy equation show that entropy should decrease, but we know this to be impossible, therefore time cannot decrease. CPT symmetry shows that time is however reversible.