Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2

From: William Robertson <wrobert9@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:54:10 -0600

How many people applaud themselves after they learn something? In guided inquiry, the focus is on the students and not on a personality garnering all the attention. Nothing against the Feynman Lectures. They're great on film and in print. But guided inquiry is better for student learning. It's not an arguable issue at this point.

Bill

On Jul 21, 2011, at 6:45 PM, carmelo@pacific.net.sg wrote:

Are there inquiry based lessons or Real Time Physics labs which are
getting applause from students?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
  - From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>

References:
- Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
  - From: Richard Hake <rrhake@earthlink.net>
- Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
  - From: carmelo@pacific.net.sg
- Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
  - From: Calvin Kalman <Calvin.kalman@Concordia.ca>
- Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
  - From: carmelo@pacific.net.sg
- Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
  - From: "Dan L. MacIsaac" <danmacisaac@mac.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
  - From: carmelo@pacific.net.sg

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
Previous by thread: Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread