Is Newtonian Mechanics What Most Needs to be Known? (was How Much
Value is Added. . . .)
The abstract of my post "How Much Value is Added at Elite
Institutions - Response to Haim #2" [Hake (2011)], reads in part
[bracketed by lines "HHHHH. . . . ."]:
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
In my post "How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions?" [Hake
(2011c)], I wrote:
". . . . demonstrations that the less-than-stellar value-added
assessments of Korsunsky's high school and Stuyvesant High School are
inequitable would require meaningful value-added measures such as
normalized average pre-to-posttest gains on valid and consistently
reliable tests of higher-order learning. . ."
Math-Teach's "Haim" responded: "The problem is that you are not sure
what you are measuring."
NONSENSE! In the case of Harvard, the higher-order learning consisted
of conceptual understanding of Newtonian mechanics.
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
"I'm . . . . just wondering if this isn't reinforcing the
traditional assumption that we know enough about the student's
probable fate and the world's probable future to assert that, in a
near-infinity of options, this particular content is what most needs
to be known?"
MARION IS INCINERATING A STRAW MAN. If he and others would take a few
minutes to scan my complete post at <http://bit.ly/gxUOAb> they would
find that I neither stated nor implied the manifest absurdity that
Newtonian mechanics is what *most* needs to be known - it's only the
third or fourth particular content in order of what needs to be known
;-).
"Of all the intellectual hurdles which the human mind has confronted
and has overcome in the last fifteen hundred years the one which
seems to me to have been the most amazing in character and the most
stupendous in the scope of its consequences is the one relating to
the problem of motion."
Herbert Butterfield (1957/1997) in "The Origins of Modern Science"
(quoted in Arons (1997,
p. 23)
REFERENCES [URL's shortened by <http://bit.ly/> and accessed on 27 Jan 2011.]
Arons, A.B. 1997. "Teaching Introductory Physics." Wiley. Amazon.com
information at <http://amzn.to/bBPfop>. Note the searchable "Look
Inside" feature.
Brady, M. 2011. "Re: How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions -
Response to Haim #2," online on the OPEN! EDDRA2 archives at
<http://yhoo.it/hNPELq>. Post of 27 Jan 27 1:51 pm (Yahoo fails to
indicate the time zone).
Butterfield, H. 1957/1997. "The Origins of Modern Science 1300-1800,"
Free Press. Amazon.com information at <http://amzn.to/hP2TMP>, note
the searchable "Look Inside" feature. First published in 1957.
Hake, R.R. 2011. "How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions -
Response to Haim #2 " online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at
<http://bit.ly/gxUOAb>. Post of 26 Jan 2011 16:14:36-0800 to AERA-L
and Net-Gold. The abstract and link to the complete post are being
transmitted to various discussion lists are also online on my blog
"Hake'sEdStuff" at <http://bit.ly/eyTZAj> with a provision for
comments.