Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy



Sorry.

Corrected:

On 2010, Jul 01, , at 11:03, Bernard Cleyet wrote:

Well, then it's not common to bc -- I correctly knew the pop of the US (~ 300 million), but thought the world pop was 3 B instead of ~ 6.8 B.

Currently:

http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html

The Wiki. definition (Dept. of Ed. and Skills (UK) and National Ctr. for Ed. Stats. (USA)) agrees w/ J. C.'s.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numeracy



bc cleaning up his >17k inbox msgs.





On 2008, Feb 29, , at 07:40, Rick Tarara wrote:

Common now John, the population of the country you live in, the world you
live on, that cities have millions of people--thus is not specialized
knowledge. These numbers effect almost every field of study--if only to
estimate how many books your memoirs might sell! You are sounding like an
apologist for ignorance. ;-(

Rick

----- Original Message -----
From: "John M Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>


This question is not a test of innumeracy, except possibly at the ends
of the spectrum. It is a test of crystallized knowledge. A real test
for numeracy is to have people compare numbers like 0.5 and 3/8. The
population of a given area is what might be called common shared
knowledge.

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l


_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l