Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:42:15 -0400
From: chuck britton<cvbritton@mac.com>
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] momentum dissipation?
To: Bob Sciamanda<treborsci@verizon.net>, Forum for Physics Educators
<phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu>
Message-ID:<a06240807c7fa80a0c533@[198.18.140.193]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
PLEASE don't ! ! ! !
Momentum should be SO much easier to understand than this.
My first real understanding of how momentum could be totally
misconceived was in freshman physics class.
The problem was a classic - a railcar that has a load of coal dumped
into it as it rolls down the track.
How much does it slow down? No big deal.
Then the cat coasts across a raised trestle and DUMPS it's load.
Does it speedup?!?!?!?!
No, the prof tells us - because the coal is still moving forward with
its own momentum.
"oh" a student proclaims "I get it, the car doesn't speed up until
the coal hits the ground!!!".
And somehow the US nuclear navy survived this NROTC kid's enlistment.
Pick your system.
Extend it enough to keep momentum constant or use N2 in it's delta p
form to account for any gain/loss.
Momentum should be covered in it's entirety before acceleration comes
up (except for a fancy word that means 'Slope of a Velocity Graph').
At 6:20 PM -0400 4/25/10, Bob Sciamanda wrote:
>Consider the case of a motorboat accelerating by exchanging momentum with
>the fluid water. It would seem that in such cases it is legitimate to speak
>of the dissipation of momentum by the water. Similar cases occur with
>aircraft/atmosphere interactions.