Re: [Phys-l] qm texts other than Copenhagen

[Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>]

Thanks John!

As I suspected, I did the "right thing", and you're so succinct.

bc


On 2010, Mar 24, , at 20:34, John Denker wrote:

> 2) If the real objective is to "preserve determinism" then
> the whole game is not worth playing.  The field has progressed
> since the 1950s.  There is absolutely no chance that a hidden
> variable theory of the sort Bohm was talking about could be
> correct.  John Bell and Alain Aspect have had something to
> say about it.
>
> _____