Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
ludwik kowalski wrote:
OOPS,I have heard this statement before - and it conflicts with my mental model
I was not the author of the message. I deleted the author's name; my
name was added from the signature file.
Ludwik
/snip/
there's an error in your argument.
See
http://www.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/ntnujava/index.php?topic=35
for a graphic (you can pause the display by clicking inside it)
showing the correct phase relationship, or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation
for a detailed account -- the section 'properties' pictures the
correct phase relationships, and 'derivation' solves M's equations for
a general propagating wave, finishing with the equation relating E and
B which shows that they are in phase.
of the process of propagation - say from a dipole.
It would be easy to observe whether the in-phase assertion is true:
for low frequency radio signals, (10kHz to 100kHz) the signal may be
observed
as an electric field, or as a magnetic field via suitable sensors to a
scope.
Brian W