Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] App. for Was: Re: T dS versus dQ

From: chuck britton <cvbritton@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:44:28 -0500

At 11:58 AM -0600 2/10/10, Brian Whatcott wrote:

There's nobody holier than the reformed sinner. In my case - I want the
term adiabiatic to mean "with no change in heating"

If you persist in using 'Heat' and 'heating' as nouns - I'll predict that NO amount of self-proclaimed 'reformation' will save you from the righteous hoards that wish to stone you. ;-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Phys-l] App. for Was: Re: T dS versus dQ
  - From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] App. for Was: Re: T dS versus dQ
  - From: Brian Whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>

References:
- [Phys-l] App. for Was: Re: T dS versus dQ
  - From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] App. for Was: Re: T dS versus dQ
  - From: "LaMontagne, Bob" <RLAMONT@providence.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] App. for Was: Re: T dS versus dQ
  - From: John Mallinckrodt <ajm@csupomona.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] App. for Was: Re: T dS versus dQ
  - From: Brian Whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>
- Re: [Phys-l] App. for Was: Re: T dS versus dQ
  - From: "LaMontagne, Bob" <RLAMONT@providence.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] App. for Was: Re: T dS versus dQ
  - From: Brian Whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>

Prev by Date: [Phys-l] Making the assembly line go faster doesn's work!
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-l] App. for Was: Re: T dS versus dQ
Previous by thread: [Phys-l] Making the assembly line go faster doesn's work!
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] App. for Was: Re: T dS versus dQ
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread