Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Response to Brian W

Now THAT is an interesting answer - that some of this red shift VHF is talking to us
as though it were from a place three times as far as the observable boundary, when in fact the size of the universe was very much less than that size when it was emitted
[I expect that comment imbeds at least one logical fallacy! :-) ]


Brian W wrote:

your note reminds me of this separate question:

As the universe is expanding at an accelerating pace, so that the

"furthest" light we can see is from 13 Bly or thereabouts,

and more distant light never can reach us,

is there an accounting for the mass and dark energy at these

larger separations?

Brian W

I just discovered I never responded to this. My apology to Brian.
Actually even though the Universe is 13.7 billion years old we actually see
light at a distance of about 46 billion light years.
This is because space time itself is expanding at the light travels from distance stars. There is a useful integral equation to calculate this distance over any scale factor.
R= c*int { 0 to t_1} (t/t_0)^(-n) dt Where observationally we set n= 0.702 and t_0 = 13.7 BLY
This is an approximate equation but it works pretty well.
Bob Zannelli