Chronology |
Current Month |
Current Thread |
Current Date |

[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |

*From*: Stefan Jeglinski <jeglin@4pi.com>*Date*: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:28:42 -0500

He doesn't say so explicitly, but I'm guessing JD doesn't have a dog in this fight per se, other than the book reviews he's offered :-). That is, there is much to be said for using the Lagrangian to solve problems, and not get too caught up in the philosophy of first principles of "where it comes from or why it looks like it does." Fair enough.

http://mitpress.mit.edu/SICM/

JD has offered this reference before and I agree that it is interesting and useful. On looking at it again, unless I have missed something, its *entire* relevance to *this* particular thread is a lone statement in Section 1.6: "The key idea is to construct a Lagrangian L such that Lagrange's equations are Newton's equations."

End of story/thread :-)

Stefan

**References**:**[Phys-l] Landau on Lagrangian***From:*Stefan Jeglinski <jeglin@4pi.com>

**[Phys-l] symmetries of the Lagrangian***From:*John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>

- Prev by Date:
**[Phys-l] Response to Brian W** - Next by Date:
**Re: [Phys-l] PV question** - Previous by thread:
**[Phys-l] symmetries of the Lagrangian** - Next by thread:
**Re: [Phys-l] Landau on Lagrangian** - Index(es):