Some physicists might be interested in the post "Re: Constructivist
Instruction: Success or Failure?" [Hake (2010)]. The abstract reads:
**********************************************
ABSTRACT: In a post "Re: All about constructivism" [Hake (2009)], I
pointed to Doug Holton's (2009) valuable post "All about
constructivism," regarding the debate engendered by Kirschner,
Sweller, & Clark's (2006) provocative "Why Minimal Guidance During
Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of
Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and
Inquiry-Based Teaching." For a recent continuation of that debate see
"Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure?" [Tobias & Duffy
(2009)]. The publisher's information at <http://tinyurl.com/y9xpear>
includes the "Table of Contents" and a description of the book,
stating that it "brings together leading thinkers from both sides of
the hotly debated controversy about constructivist approaches to
instruction." An especially insightful contribution is David Klahr's
(2009) "To Every Thing There is a Season, and a Time to Every Purpose
Under the Heavens," wherein Klahr emphasizes the importance of
*operational definitions* in science education, as was also
underscored in "Language Ambiguities in Education Research" [Hake
(2008)].
**********************************************
Tobias, Sigmund & T.M. Duffy. eds. 2009. "Constructivist Instruction:
Success or Failure?" Routledge; forward by Robert J. Sternberg,
publisher's information at <http://tinyurl.com/y9xpear>. Amazon.com
information at <http://tinyurl.com/ye8y5xp>. For a *severely*
truncated version see the Google Book preview at
<http://tinyurl.com/yaffdma>.