"It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford's book organizes the facts very well.) I don't believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.
"So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it.
"....I want no part of it, so please accept my resignation."
In addition to the bull-in-the-china-shop issue of GW/CC, physics educators may be asked by their students the question of how a scientist deals publicly with a scientific position he holds when he knows it will receive strong (political) opposition.
As I recall, Galileo Galilei did have a problem with the authorities when he adamantly took a scientific stand. Of course, Nicolas Copernicus was on his deathbed when he finally had his heliocentric theory published. And Ole Roemer's claim of the finite speed of light was never widely accepted until well after his death.