Re: [Phys-l] SuperMemo

["Anthony Lapinski" <Anthony_Lapinski@pds.org>]

True. I give similar tests each year (I keep all old tests), and kids make
the same mistakes. So I have set deductions for each one. Makes grading
quick and fair.

Forum for Physics Educators <phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu> writes:
> Right , and I found not always sufficient.  I'd go back and review  
> the first few when I was deciding how to apportion partial credit.
>
> bc
>
>
> On 2009, Apr 28, , at 16:39, Anthony Lapinski wrote:
>
> > This might be true, especially for free response problems. I generally
> > wait until all tests are in before I start grading the math  
> > portion. Then
> > I grade the same problem for everyone to insure fairness/ 
> > consistency when
> > giving partial credit.
> >
> > Forum for Physics Educators <phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu>  
> > writes:
> > > I suspect grading papers w/ out knowing the author, would lead to
> > > less bias.
> > >
> > > bc
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2009, Apr 27, , at 10:23, Julie Hilsenteger wrote:
> > >
> > > >  I use it while grading papers too to help link it all.  I have
> > > > names down by the end of the 2nd week of school by doing this.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Forum for Physics Educators
> > > Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> > > https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Forum for Physics Educators
> > Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> > https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l