Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Wealth does not require redistribution in a free society that has aBut, often, we do pair off the slower kids and the quicker ones and
constitution that respects it's citizens and their property rights.
Wealth goes to those who most deserve it - and indirectly, even to
those who don't. The wealthy grow the wealth of the entire country
while they are gathering their own. The non-productive elements of a
free society get to partake partake in that increased bounty. The
rich (in a free economy) deserve their wealth - the poor deserve
their smaller portion.
None of us would sanction taking points from the high achievers in
our classes and redistribute them to the non-performers. Yet somehow
that's OK when wealth is involved.
And, support better stewardship of our own resources so the SUV and
If one really wants to clean up the environment, vigorously support
economic and social freedom for everyone - especially those in
countries ruled by despots and other central planner types.
_______________________________________________
Bob at PC
_