Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] CFLs



112V suggests a high complementary phase on other sockets etc. Worth a little more checking?

Brian W

Philip Keller wrote:
Just measured: 112 V. But that doesn't mean it isn't spiky. And as for the frequent bumps and vibrations, well yes, we have those. So I guess it's CFCs or kids...
________________________________________
From: phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu [phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu] On Behalf Of Brian Whatcott [betwys1@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:29 PM
To: Forum for Physics Educators
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] CFLs

Philip Keller wrote:
Well what have I been doing wrong? I've tried a variety of brands and NONE have lasted more than 6 months. Some were in recessed fixtures (I am told that is a no-go) but others not. It is hard to pay $7 for a bulb that doesn't last long enough to pay back the investment. I feel guilty not buying them and then I feel guilty when they have to be thrown away...
You have spiky line power or
an intermittent neutral/ground connection or
a high level of vibration in the ceiling area or
frequent bumps in the ceiling area.

Wildly guessing now.... I expect the incandescents you formerly used
also failed rather quickly?

You are not alone.

Brian W

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l