Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] science education goals and strategies

From: "John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:30:09 -0600

1) As several people have wisely and accurately pointed out, the
integrated "spiral" approach is obviously best for the students.

How do you know it is "best"? What evidence is there for this? Can some
relevant research be cited?

Unfortunately obviously is not evidence.

John M. Clement
Houston, TX

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Phys-l] science education goals and strategies
  - From: "Anthony Lapinski" <Anthony_Lapinski@pds.org>

References:
- Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
  - From: Richard Hake <rrhake@earthlink.net>
- Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
  - From: "Woolf, Larry" <larry.woolf@ga.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
  - From: Jack Uretsky <jlu@hep.anl.gov>
- [Phys-l] Goals for HS Science (was Physics First Revisited)
  - From: "Edmiston, Mike" <edmiston@bluffton.edu>
- [Phys-l] science education goals and strategies
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-l] science education goals and strategies
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-l] science education goals and strategies
Previous by thread: [Phys-l] science education goals and strategies
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] science education goals and strategies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread