Chronology |
Current Month |
Current Thread |
Current Date |

[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |

*From*: Stefan Jeglinski <jeglin@4pi.com>*Date*: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 01:44:53 -0500

More to discuss, but I have these comments after a number of G&Ts for the evening:

In the limit as É¢x gets small and NÉ¢x gets big, the output

becomes nearly continuous and spans a huge frequency range,

in which case the discrete Fourier transform looks a whole

lot like the old fashioned non-discrete Fourier transform.

Hmmm. Not sure I would use this wording, but correct me if I'm wrong. As NÉ¢x gets big, the output does indeed span a huge frequency range, but does not become "more" continuous, it seems to me. Refer to your own fourier-refined link, section 3 (in particular the move from Fig 2 to Fig 3 via eq 23), where you discuss increasing the resolution - this is what I would have interpreted as creating a transform that is nearly continuous, "via using the existing data in more-informative ways."

> I have been applying the DFT to sampled data (specifically a

single-pulse, hence non-periodic, waveform)

There is no such thing. All DFT methods are tantamount to

*assuming* that your input signal is periodically continued.

I have seen discussions in which the comment is made: sampling "causes" the periodic extension. I have felt this is either a very deep statement, or a very poorly-worded statement. Your use of the word "tantamount" doesn't help me decide :-)

Stefan Jeglinski

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: [Phys-l] some questions related to sampling***From:*John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>

**References**:**[Phys-l] some questions related to sampling***From:*Stefan Jeglinski <jeglin@4pi.com>

**Re: [Phys-l] some questions related to sampling***From:*John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: [Phys-l] some questions related to sampling** - Next by Date:
**Re: [Phys-l] some questions related to sampling** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [Phys-l] some questions related to sampling** - Next by thread:
**Re: [Phys-l] some questions related to sampling** - Index(es):