Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
'New Math' came along shortly after the Sputnick wake-up call.
My sister in the second grade was using the same words that I was
being introduced to in NSF summer math institutes.
i.e. associative, distributive and commutative properties
I could have handled those concepts in the second grade - but they
would just be a fun add-on to the rote work.
It was in the second grade that I finished up a one and two digit
exercise in addition and decided to go back and repeat the problems
with subtraction instead of addition.
This was just to fend off boredom.
When I came to the somewhat unexpected 'problem' of subtracting seven
from four - I just made up a new notation - the answer is clearly
'three in-the-hole' so I wrote down the three and drew a circle
around it to signify 'in-the-hole'.
I had written down the 'correct' addition answers so the teacher
wasn't bothered too much with the extra scribbling.
On Jul 20, 2008, at Jul 20(Sun) 1:03 , John Denker wrote:
Here's something you don't see every day: An informative, non-
polemical,
non-hysterical news article about new math ± old math.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/wayoflife/07/18/
renegade.math.parents.ap/index.html
Story Highlights_______________________________________________
# Parents sometimes struggle with kids' concept-based math curricula
# Method teach the ideas behind mathematics, rather than rote
procedures
# Parents don't understand the new methods; can't help with homework
# Rebel parents teach kids the old -fashioned math methods
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l