Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Transparency

From: chuck britton <cvbritton@embarqmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:34:38 -0400

So we'd expect diamond to transparent to a charged particle beam?

On Oct 10, 2008, at Oct 10(Fri) 12:39 , John Denker wrote:

On 10/10/2008 09:07 AM, chuck britton wrote:

So a diamond is transparent to an electron beam????

weird

I don't think diamond is any weirder than silicon.

References:
- [Phys-l] Transparency
  - From: Brian Whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>
- Re: [Phys-l] Transparency
  - From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] Transparency
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] Transparency
  - From: chuck britton <britton@ncssm.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] Transparency
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] Transparency
  - From: Stefan Jeglinski <jeglin@4pi.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] Transparency
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-l] Transparency
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-l] Transparency
Previous by thread: Re: [Phys-l] Transparency
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] Transparency
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread