Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
The string is not touching the water. Hence the string is exerting no"how fast do I have to spin a bucket in a vertical circle to avoidsubtleties to help
water spilling out?" problem. It's got plenty of
divide those who really understand the situation from the plug andforce on the
chuggers (for instance, anyone who draws tension in as a
water is probably not thinking too carefully about the situation).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I am puzzled by the obvious derision being heaped upon
someone who would include the tension in the string in his
analysis. The AHA! moment here is when one realizes that as
the speed is lowered the acceleration at the top is provided
less and less by the tension while the gravitational force
(weight) remains the same - eventually becoming the only
force needed to ensure the circular motion. I would suspect
that any approach which uses a free body diagram that does
not include tension is simply guess work on the student's part.
Bob at PC