Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] CFL's not such a hot idea

From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 10:40:26 -0700

Not I.

bc

Polvani, Donald G. wrote:

We are trying CFLs in our entrance foyer at home as replacements for 2

cut

Has anyone else noticed an apparent decrease in light output when
replacing an incandescent with a CFL with a reputed equivalent or
greater light output? If so, were the bulbs enclosed by glass globes?
The decrease in light output is so noticeable that we are considering
replacing the CFLs with the original incandescents.

Don Polvani
Northrop Grumman Corp.
Undersea Systems
Annapolis, MD

cut

References:
- [Phys-l] CFL's not such a hot idea
  - From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] CFL's not such a hot idea
  - From: Clarence Bennett <bennett@oakland.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] CFL's not such a hot idea
  - From: "Edmiston, Mike" <edmiston@bluffton.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] CFL's not such a hot idea
  - From: Crawford J Maccallum <mccallum@unm.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] CFL's not such a hot idea
  - From: "Polvani, Donald G." <donald.polvani@ngc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-l] CFL's Read the fine print.
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-l] home wiring catastrophe
Previous by thread: Re: [Phys-l] CFL's not such a hot idea
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] CFL's not such a hot idea
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread