Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
I don't think so. The issue is, what is the system. In the case of gravity, it clearly is the "gravitor" and the "gravitee," if it is even possible to make that distinction. That is, the earth and the ball become more tightly bound to each other as the ball rolls down the incline, and so the mass of the earth *and* the mass of the ball, collectively decrease. It makes no sense to talk about either the mass of the earth *or* the mass of the ball individually changing, although it seems reasonable to me that to the extent one can torture the theory to actually talk about the changes in individual masses, that this change would be distributed in proportion to the original masses of each, in which case, most of the change would have to be attributed to the earth rather than the ball. there may be good arguments that would allow one to attribute the change to the ball, or at least mostly to the ball, but I don't know of them if they exist.
So, the increase in elastic potential energy of a spring will effectively increase the spring's mass. The increase in gravitational potential energy of a muon will increase the muon's mass. If a muon is moving towards the earth, its mass would decrease. This seems to be John's conclusion. :-)