Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] CFL's not such a hot idea



What is considered to be proper procedure for recycling cfl's? The nearest recycler has all fluorescents put into a metal garbage can. The employees (some of my students) use a tamper to break all of the bulbs. The kids are told to wear a cloth mask. The rule is not enforced.
I've told the kids that this is dangerous. They laugh it off.
How does a site get certified for this stuff?

Paul Lulai
Physics Teacher & Online Learning Coordinator
St. Anthony Village Senior High
Saint Anthony Village, MN
55418
(w) 612-706-1144
(fax) 612-706-1020
plulai@stanthony.k12.mn.us



-----Original Message-----
From: phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu on behalf of Stefan Jeglinski
Sent: Tue 5/1/2007 10:55 AM
To: Forum for Physics Educators
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] CFL's not such a hot idea

The question is, if mercury containing lamps are landfilled, how much of
the mercury will get into the ground water. Some say that in a good
landfill, none should get into the groundwater.

I also found this interesting:

http://www.orcbs.msu.edu/waste/resources_links/universal_waste/universal_waste.htm

The "green end" tubes, at least for this waste disposal site's
suggestion, cause a greater concern for glass shrapnel. No apparent
concern that boxing and placing in a dumpster will almost certainly
cause them to eventually be crushed and the Hg released. Perhaps
entrainment in the cardboard is considered enough, aside the
assumption of a "good landfill."


Stefan Jeglinski
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l