Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Hi all-
WhileI don't understand the relevance of Bernard's story,
I'll respond to John:
All definitions are arbitrary, with certain limitations that avoid confusion. So why argue?
Regards,
Jack
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Bernard Cleyet wrote:
As w/ all good legends much of the Fisher pen is true * :
http://www.snopes.com/business/genius/spacepen.asp
* If Snopes is correct.
bc, googling again.
carmelo@pacific.net.sg wrote:
John Mallinckrodt wrote:_______________________________________________
I understand that lots of people (including apparently the folks atThis reminds me of another urban legend...
NIST) want weight to be the same thing as gravitational force, but I
have yet to hear one compelling reason for that. Moreover, I submit
that weight is demonstrably NOT the same thing as gravitational force
in common parlance. Again, if astronauts are not "weightless," then
I simply don't see any good use for the word.
The story goes like this: in the 1960s, NASA astronauts discovered that their pens did not work in zero gravity. So like good engineers, they went to work and designed a wonder pen. It worked upside down. It worked in vacuum. It worked in zero gravity. It even worked underwater! And it only cost a million dollars! The crafty Russians used a pencil.
I prefer to tell this story using "microgravity" instead of "zero gravity". Is there anywhere in the universe where the gravitation force is *exactly* zero, and whatever your frame of reference?
Alphonsus
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l