[Phys-l] Maturity? Was: Re: Falling Bullets--What is the question??

[Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>]

and how does one standardize or adjust for difficulty?

Regarding political maturity, academic Physicists beat Engineers and
Chemist by a very long shot and even Biologists.


http://www.bepress.com/forum/vol3/iss1/art2/


See Table 2

bc, biassed, what else?


carmelo@pacific.net.sg wrote:

> Dick wrote:
>  
>
> > That was not very progressive, but then someone wrote a 
> > one-liner--all bullets are falling, which prompted the response that 
> > that was a smart ass comment and inappropriate, so the discussion 
> > then went on to the (non-netiquette) and whether the metacomment was 
> > inappropriate etc.  
> >    
>
> Perhaps Physics Education Research should be conducted to investigate the average emotional intelligence of physicists. I suspect it is lower than chemists and biologists. And this is one of the contributing factors to the falling enrolment in physics. Often hear more complaints on Physics Lecture than others...
>
> Alphonsus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
>
>
>