Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
On 12/02/2006 11:32 AM, Josh Gates-fac wrote:
.... everyone was reported to be (I believe...) no
lower than the top 10%;
I was wondering how this "reporting" works in practice.
Suppose there are 400 students in the senior class.
How is the 400th student reported?
a) #40 out of 400 (i.e. falsifying the numerator), or
b) #400 out of 4000 (i.e. falsifying the denominator)?
Whom is this supposed to fool?
-- Students?
-- Parents?
-- College admissions committees?
the theory was that everyone would have been in
the top 10% at their home high schools.
Ah, that sounds like option (b).
So for consistency, does that mean that for each such magnet
school where everybody is reported in the top 10%, there are
9 diamagnet schools where nobody is reported in the top 10%,
no matter how well they do? That would at least produce
internally-consistent rankings across the full 4000-student
pool.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l