Chronology  Current Month  Current Thread  Current Date 
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]  [Date Index] [Thread Index]  [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]  [Date Prev] [Date Next] 
I just made a quick (5 minute) cursory glance at the reference below; it
appears very interesting, however, I'm bothered a bit by the discussion
of gravitational PE on page 3.
  Please read "Making Work Work" at
 <http://modeling.asu.edu/modeling/MakingWorkWork.pdf
<http://modeling.asu.edu/modeling/MakingWorkWork.pdf> >

The author makes much of saying saying that we won't say there is a PE
associated with the system of two masses, since we can't locate the
energy in either body. Therefore they conclude that it resides in the
gravitational field.
I fail to see what is wrong with associating PE with the system, the
distance between the objects being the state variable. They mention this
interpretation and then reject it.
I suppose they must do the same thing when it comes to discussing PE of
a system of 2 charges. I.e. the modelers calculate energy in a charge
configuration by integrating E^2 over a volume, rather than by
qQ/distance???
I have to go to class, now so I can't write more;
Any comments, discussion?
Joel R
________________________ Joel Rauber Department of Physics  SDSU
Joel.Rauber@sdstate.edu 6056884293
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Physl@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/physl