/It's that time of year again: the start of school. Chapter 1 of
the textbook goes on and on about significant digits. A few
students sit there, fidgeting, wondering whether the teacher is
really crazy enough to believe this stuff. The more they think
about it, the less sense it makes. But// only a few of them bother
to think about it at all; most of them learned long ago that
thinking about classwork is a lose/lose proposition./
Maybe I'm overly optimistic, but I think we can do better than that. We
can start by eradicating the sigfig nonsense. I recently updated my
web page on the subject.
How Many Digits Should Be Used?
Use many enough digits to avoid unintended loss of significance. Use few
enough digits to be reasonably convenient.
How Should Uncertainty Be Expressed?
Express the uncertainty separately and explicitly. For example,
1.234(55) or equivalently 1.234±0.055.
State the form of the distribution, unless this is obvious from context.
Examples include Gaussian, square, triangular, et cetera.
What About Significant Digits?
The whole notion of significant digits is heavily flawed; see section 8
<http://www.av8n.com/physics/uncertainty.htm#sec-abomination> for more
on this. Anything that can be done by means of significant digits can be
done much better by other means. People who care about their data don’t
use significant digits.