Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Huh?
Just today (before reading the below) someone * at UCSC told me it was
virtual photons. To check up, the first response to --- virtual
photons coulomb --- was:
http://pages.globetrotter.net/srp/exp2000a.htm
Is this guy off his rocker?
* I was relating my discovery (pleasant) of J. Bernstein's "Intro to
Cosmology" and how far behind I was in semi-current theory.
bc
Jack Uretsky wrote:
The answer to your question is, "No". The coulomb force, for_______________________________________________
example, does not come from photon exchange. EM waves interact with
matter through photon exchange. The EM potential can be divided into
longitudinal and transverse parts; only the transverse part is quantized.
The longitudinal part gives the coulomb force.
Regards,
Jack
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Brian Blais wrote:
Jack Uretsky wrote:
Hi all-thanks for the correction! I knew I should have read more about it before
Brian Blais writes, in part, with respect to the trajectory of a
thrown ball:
5) quantum gravity: the ball exchanges gravitons with the Earth,
which influe$> pathSorry, Brian. This is a complete misconception. "Gravitons"
represent the interactions of gravitational waves which are far too weak
to perceptibly influence the trajectory of a thrown baseball.
speaking... :)
But, the modern quantum description of interaction is entirely due to particle
exchange, yes? or am I mistake on that too (it's been a while since I've looked at
it, and I don't think that I ever studied gravity with respect to these things).
How does string theory describe this process of the ball going up and down in the
Earth's gravitational field?
bb
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l