Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Suppression of Scientific Work



In his Phys-L post of 5 Mar 2006 21:37:12-0600 titled "Re: [Phys-l] Suppression of Scientific Work (was Self Censorship in Human Immunology)," Jack Uretsky wrote (minor typos corrected):

". . . will you for crying out loud, climb off your advocacy horse and give us a simple statement of the facts that a five-year-old mind like mine can understand. Was a scientifically accurate article pulled from a peer-reviewed journal because its conclusions were politically undesirable? I think that this question can be accurately answered, yes or no."

Here's a version of my previous post "Suppression of Scientific Work (was Self Censorship in Human Immunology)" for five-year old minds:

"The evidence I've found on the internet (too complex for your young minds to comprehend) strongly suggests that a scientifically accurate article was pulled from a peer-reviewed journal because its conclusions were politically undesirable."

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
24245 Hatteras Street, Woodland Hills, CA 91367
<rrhake@earthlink.net>
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake>
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi>


REFERENCES
Hake, R.R. 2006. "Suppression of Scientific Work (was Self Censorship in Human Immunology)," online at <https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/archives/2006/03_2006/msg00008.html>. Post of 5 Mar 2006 18:50:10-0800 to AERA-L, DrEd, Phys-L, PhysLrnR, and TIPS.