In his Phys-L post of 5 Mar 2006 21:37:12-0600 titled "Re: [Phys-l]
Suppression of Scientific Work (was Self Censorship in Human
Immunology)," Jack Uretsky wrote (minor typos corrected):
". . . will you for crying out loud, climb off your advocacy horse
and give us a simple statement of the facts that a five-year-old mind
like mine can understand. Was a scientifically accurate article
pulled from a peer-reviewed journal because its conclusions were
politically undesirable? I think that this question can be
accurately answered, yes or no."
Here's a version of my previous post "Suppression of Scientific Work
(was Self Censorship in Human Immunology)" for five-year old minds:
"The evidence I've found on the internet (too complex for your young
minds to comprehend) strongly suggests that a scientifically accurate
article was pulled from a peer-reviewed journal because its
conclusions were politically undesirable."