Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
At 10:05 AM 12/17/2005, Bob, you wrote:ld show
I used to look forward to articles on cutting edge physics that wou=
ntedup in SciAm. ///
I noticed a big change a few years ago. Articles seemed to be prese=
o be thatsolely for the glorification of the author. The attitude appeared t=
subjectthe audience is too dumb to follow the intricacies of a particular =
cialist.and the authors make no attempt to clarify concepts for the non-spe=
_______________________________________________///
:-(
Bob at PC
Hmmm....New Scientist seems to have gained a glossy finish too.
There are still nuggets of new science though.
Brian Whatcott Altus OK Eureka!